Page 5 of 13

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 2:44 am
by Racer Rog
markson wrote:[ATTACH=CONFIG]8495[/ATTACH] NoT quite Racer Rog. Graham


Close
Roger

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 5:50 am
by bry3500
From Bolly Blog

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 2:05 pm
by markson
screen pillar.JPG
screen fit bolwell.jpg

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 4:56 pm
by markson
Just another feature that the Bolwell and the Markson have in common??? Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 6:46 pm
by markson
Hi Thunder 427. Definitely not HK Monaro trim .Monaro clips to rain channel .Markson is all one piece .Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 7:53 pm
by markson
chassis 1.JPG
chassis 2.JPG
chassis 3.JPG

Hi bry3500 This is how the front tubular chassis, bolts to the fire wall, just like an E type Jag .Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 12:50 am
by SATIATOR
Does the wheelbase happen to be 88" ?

Bottom wishbone looks like Triumph TR4-TR6 or Jaguar to me, as in forged with bolt on spring plate.

Can we have a closer pic of the front suspension and rack as well as the rear suspension to help ID parts.

Cheers
Kevin


markson wrote:[ATTACH=CONFIG]8634[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8635[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8636[/ATTACH]
Hi bry3500 This is how the front tubular chassis, bolts to the fire wall, just like an E type Jag .Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:00 am
by markson
suspension front.JPG
suspension rear.JPG



Hi Satiator Photo of front and rear of suspension
I think its Austin A55 or A60.Top A arm has been fabricated???.Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 8:20 pm
by markson
2
bolwell side view.jpg
BOLWELL side view
Markson Amero.jpg
Markson side view
amero side view.JPG

AMERO side view

I just wonderer who was looking over who's fence .Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 7:37 pm
by markson
markson rear 1-4 window 3.JPG

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 7:41 pm
by markson
P1090296.JPG

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 7:44 pm
by markson
P1090153.JPG

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 5:43 pm
by markson
Hi Well after nearly a month in this forum, I am no further ahead with info on this car,than I was 6 months ago
As I said in the beginning of my posts, that this car must be one of the very few that no one seems to have any info on . :confused: Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 10:04 pm
by markec
Being a one off with not much history will be most of the reason.

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 10:44 pm
by markson
You are probably right markec,but I think the people with its origin, for what ever reason don't really want it known.I have been able to establish most of its history (eg) past owner's.I would just like to know who built it. Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:38 am
by Paul Wilkinson
Wherever it came from it's a lovely wee car. Really nice proportions I reckon. I really wanted it when it was on Trademe but for once had the good sense not to buy a project when another one was underway....

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 5:28 am
by markson
Yes Paul you are correct, the photo's don't do it justice ,and a lot of people say the same as yourself, just as a matter of interest I spent a lot of time in, and under your Lotus for many years, when Charlie had it .Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:58 am
by Paul Wilkinson
markson wrote:Yes Paul you are correct, the photo's don't do it justice ,and a lot of people say the same as yourself, just as a matter of interest I spent a lot of time in, and under your Lotus for many years, when Charlie had it .Graham


It's a shame it was stored the way it was. It will be interesting to see the state of the engine when it's checked out next week. Have you any idea when Charlie laid it up? From memory the most recent scrutineering sticker I can see is 1992 although he reckons he used it on the road for a while.

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:58 pm
by markson
Hi Paul From memory I don't think it was ever driven after that time.There is someone who can give you better info than myself.I will send you a private post with his name and number .Graham

Re: imformatin required

Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:26 pm
by markson
Hi Paul From memory I don't think it was ever driven after that time.There is someone who can give you better info than myself.I will send you a private post with his name and number .Graham