rf84 wrote: Given the opportunity Racer Rog and Russ would go race Honda powered cars, Carlo would go buy one of his beaut Ecotec cars and start up a class for those and ERC would have us all in ERC cars (whatever they are). So we would now have 5 classes of FF's where now there are 2 (the current FF's+ Historic FF's). But we would not have 5 times as many competitors. So this is why we desperately need a PLAN.
Ummm, no, I never actually said that, but I agree with your point
I have expanded my thoughts on the NZFF. Some may choose to disagree….
With regard to crunch’s report, the MSNZ final recommendations to the executive were fine as far as they went. They were recommendations mainly for immediate cost limitations in the formula and they seem to have been implemented, and that is good. However there is nothing in that to address the real issues facing FF.
Their recommendations concluded by stating.
• As soon as these points are communicated and set in motion, then the rest of the many recommendations in the previous draft documents can be considered.From my perspective there doesn’t seem to have been much that has happened since. Maybe behind the scenes? Although crunch has stated that this had stalled. It would be enlightening to know in detail the reasons why......
Some of the rest of the recommendations that the report of the FF Focus group identified, amongst other things and slightly paraphrased:-
FF must attract long term, “journeyman” competitors and make FF a destination as opposed to a stop off point
That MSNZ and TRS management jointly investigate the possibility of an “incentives scheme” for the winner(s) of the NZFF Championship
Which may even be an incentive for some of the younger competitors to stay within the class to hone their skills for another year
This could be in the form of a free engine lease for the coming season. (I presume they mean for TRS)
That’s all well and good and no one could argue with any of that and it would be good to see that implemented.
BUT everything in the documents looks only at the championship itself. The focus needs to be widened to consider the underlying factors that affect participation in the championship. Particularly with respect to long term competitors.
The major issue facing FF, is that FF must attract long term competitors. This was identified by the Focus Group although they didn’t state it was the major issue. That is my take on it. There are other issues, but that of long term competitors is the major one IMO.
Due to the cost involved crossing the Strait and the distances involved, the majority of long time competitors are only likely to do the Championship races in their own island. Say three meetings. Not much incentive to own or race a car!
If FF is to remain viable nationally, a NIFF series is needed. There needs to be a ”feeder” into the NZFF in the form of a NI regional championship to engender enthusiasm and promote the class at the “journeyman” level, similar to the SIFF.
If we look at SIFF, it is a regional championship currently over six rounds where locals can get competitive seat time and feed into the NZFF. If it wasn’t for South Island entrants, where would the current NZFF championship be? Teretonga and Levels had only one NI entrant. Manfield, HD and Taupo, 4 SI entrants, all front runners. Where would Taupo have been without the historic Fords?
The SIFF Championship is viewed seriously by those competing in it and it is interesting that two of the three top runners in NZFF in the time between HD and Taupo chose to bring their cars home, change out their championship motors for their spare ones to compete in the SIFF Levels round last weekend. Then change them back again. They’ve got the Taupo Tier 1 final this weekend and the SIFF final at Ruapuna next weekend.
Quite frankly in the SI we could be quite insular, we have a six round SI series. It is a grass roots series run “by the competitors, for the competitors” with no MSNZ organisational involvement, although our regs align with Sch. F. Despite recent lows, grid numbers are now showing signs of resurgence. So far this season we have had double digit grids at all meetings, despite the attrition caused by cars not present due to damage and other disasters. I am optimistic enough to believe next season will build on this and continue the upswing.
Personally, I would like to see the NZFF rounds in the SI also be incorporated by SIFF as part of the SIFF championship which would presumably boost NZFF grids as has happened in the past. This would then make the SIFF an 8 or 9 round series. However there may be some resistance to that idea from other competitors, some of whom may view multi day meetings as overly onerous financially and time wise. All the SIFF rounds are one day events, usually Sunday.
A change away from the Kent engine would be a retrograde step. IMO at the present time. Many of the “journeymen” competitors for instance would probably be very hesitant about leasing engines from Ford or anyone. Also whilst the Honda may be a good thing in itself, the Kent engine is established and it is possible that if the Honda, or any other engine was adopted by NZFF that SIFF would stay with the Kent, as the existing formula works well for our series.
That would of course have a significant flow on effect to NZFF. It is a fact that SIFF is a stand alone series and doesn’t actually need MSNZ or NZFF. Indeed, if anything, the reverse is true. It follows therefore that MSNZ and NZFF need a regional NIFF series from which to also draw competitors.
So in answer to the question in the subject of this thread. Yes there is a future for FF provided a feeder regional NI series can be established. But this will only happen if there is a combined will amongst car owners and drivers and clubs/promoters to make it happen IMHO.
The question then becomes how, and what is the best way this can be achieved?