jim short wrote:,give me an old Buckler anytime than some shiny yank tank .
Get your cheque book out Jim, you could buy mine!

jim short wrote:,give me an old Buckler anytime than some shiny yank tank .
John McKechnie wrote:And while you are talking Jags, Jim, dont forget Scott Wisemans E-type was also classified as a saloon for the Mercury and other races.I thought you would have bought that to my attention as well.
Definition of a saloon car -anything that has 4 wheels.E-type, 911,RX7
Definition of a sports car -anything that has 4 wheels.E-Type, 911, RX7
And in the 70s single seaters ran with sports car.
So lets have a race meeting where we get rid of all this class rubbish- Suzukis against Supertourers .Bucklers against F5000.
After all, they all have one thing in common-they are racecars.
jim short wrote:No I like the one on TM,a real one
RacerT wrote:Unfortunately most people don’t seem to get it about Historic and Classic racing!
The more ‘wrong’ cars you allow in to race, the more ‘right’ cars stay away next time!
O
ver and over again you hear that the promoter has had to let in non-confirming cars because numbers are down, when in reality taking a stand may be tough the first year, but would reap benefits in the years to come.
Short term gain for the promoter, but long term deficit in the fields in the future.
Most people want a level playing field in largely the correct field of cars that gives everyone their place in the structure.
There are some people who obviously don’t care about inequality and will just race, but the majority of us are like children who quickly cry “not fair, not fair!”, and end up taking the toys away.
AMCO72 wrote:Racer T.......if the promoters had been tough at that event there would have been 3 cars on the grid in the 'Classic Saloons'.....but at least I would have been guaranteed a podium. A long way to go for a 3 horse race!